IPL 2024: Controversy has arisen over the dismissal of Sanju Samson
Social media debate: out or not out?
The IPL 2024 match between Delhi Capitals and Rajasthan Royals was marred with controversy, especially over the dismissal of Sanju Samson. After being out, a heated debate broke out on social media platforms whether Samson was out or not. While some argued in favor of the umpire’s decision, others criticized it as a poor decision. The controversy escalated when Samson himself protested the decision on the field, expressing his disappointment and even attempting to initiate a review. Despite these efforts, the decision stood, leaving Samson and his fans dissatisfied.
Debatable Catch: Shai Hope’s boundary Catch
A CONTROVERSIAL DECISION FROM THE 3RD UMPIRE. 😳pic.twitter.com/JC9x8ZYx5Q
— Mufaddal Vohra (@mufaddal_vohra) May 7, 2024
During Sanju’s innings, an important catch of Shai Hope at the boundary line became the focal point of controversy. As Sanju Samson Aggressively aimed to bridge the run gap, he hit a powerful shot that looked destined for a boundary. However, Hope’s catch, Which led to Samson Being out for 86 in just 46 balls, faced doubt Some spectators argued that Hope’s foot might have touched the boundary line while taking the catch, raising doubts over the validity of Samson’s dismissal. Despite ongoing debate, the umpire’s decision remained final, further escalating the controversy.
Join MyFinal11 WhatsApp Community
Impact on matches and player conduct
The controversy surrounding Samson’s dismissal undoubtedly had an impact on the dynamics of the match and player conduct. Rajasthan Royals suffered a setback in their path to victory due to Samson’s dismissal at a crucial juncture of the game. Furthermore, Samson’s obvious disappointment after getting out shows the seriousness of the situation. As the debate continues on social media platforms, the controversy shows no signs of subsiding, with fans divided over the legality of Samson’s dismissal in the IPL 2024 match between Delhi Capitals and Rajasthan Royals.
